Showing posts with label F*c*book. Show all posts
Showing posts with label F*c*book. Show all posts

24 November 2025

Meta and Crimes Against Children

Meta would ban you for saying something mean about the Jab in 2020, but target kids, and they (allegedly) looked the other way. The Allegations Against Meta in Newly Unsealed Court Filings | TIME

Sex trafficking on Meta platforms was both difficult to report and widely tolerated, according to a court filing unsealed Friday. In a plaintiffs’ brief filed as part of a major lawsuit against four social media companies, Instagram’s former head of safety and well-being Vaishnavi Jayakumar testified that when she joined Meta in 2020 she was shocked to learn that the company had a “17x” strike policy for accounts that reportedly engaged in the “trafficking of humans for sex.”

You should click thru are read the details. It is not a long article, considering the gravity of the topic.

The hat tip goes to Not the Bee: Sex trafficking was "widely tolerated" on Meta's sites, according to unsealed court docs (wait until you see the stats) 😬 which has a great deal more than just the link to Time. Then there is this:

Besides allowing sex trafficking, prostitution, and grooming from pedophiles, Facebook is also accused of downplaying the results of a 2019 internal study that showed teens' mental health improved when they stopped using their apps.

The discussion on X around Not The Bee's post is also interesting.

28 August 2025

Liberal Savior or Racist Idiot - It Is Hard to See a Difference

Miguel Gonzalez interacts with people on F*c*book, so we don't have to. Where I Am To Be Saved by the KKK: Kind, Kompassionate and Karing Liberal
Because I am not squeamish about engaging in conversations that reek of stupid, I made a series of comments on a FB friend’s timeline who was comparing the U.S. now with the fall of Rome. One of the people interacting made a comment and what followed is just Liberal Fool’s Gold.

Lastname = "Gonzalez" means, without a doubt in the Liberal savior's mind, that Miguel MUST have brown skin. It is perhaps the most obviously racist of the comments. (Can you find the Iberian Peninsula on a map?)

The most obvious racism somehow still manages to not be the stupidest thing in the comment. Click thru for the whole thing.

13 July 2025

The Award for Stupid Criminal of the Year Goes To...

A lot of criminals are stupid, but few are this stupid. Woman incriminates herself in reply to post insulting thief: ‘This woman called me trash’

A woman was on vacation when she was notified that her home had been broken into. She posted photos and a scathing remark on F*c*book.

When Davidson’s plane landed, she found that Cape had incriminated herself, replying to the Facebook post and allegedly admitting her guilt.

“People need to mind their own business. This woman called me trash… just because I broke in her house and stole some stuff. She don’t even know me. But thinks it’s ok to call me trash,” Cape wrote.

She hadn't been arrested at the time the article published, and I doubt we will hear more about this trash.

Sometimes I think humanity doesn't desrve to survive.

04 April 2025

I'm Shocked that Zuckerberg Seems to be Lying

OK I'm not really shocked. From the Daily Caller: Zuckerberg’s Right-Wing Metamorphosis Appears To Be A Giant Facade

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg’s recent shift rightward appears to be little more than window dressing, as his company’s policies still favor mass censorship.

He got beat up for censorship, so suddenly he was opposed to censorship. It appears it was all marketing lies.

Additionally, Meta still has a lengthy section on “Misinformation,” an oft-used term for its COVID-19 censorship, much of which, Zuckerberg later revealed, came at the behest of the Biden administration. (RELATED: Mark Zuckerberg Tells Joe Rogan That Biden Admin Would ‘Scream’ And ‘Curse’ At Meta Employees To Censor ‘True’ Content)

The misinformation section states “there is no way to articulate a comprehensive list of what is prohibited.”

Go read the whole thing.

02 December 2024

More on F*c*book Censorship

Colion Noir has a video on the recent decision by F*c*book to suspend Smith & Wesson from their platform. Facebook Just Banned Smith & Wesson, Why Gun Owners Should Care?

Let's dive into why Facebook’s censorship of the 2A community is a direct attack on the most American of rights—and why platforms like X are becoming the new battleground for free speech and gun culture.

Liberty Doll also has a video on this subject, that includes why she had to remove an AR-10 from her "studio" because of YouTube insanity. Smith & Wesson Kicked Off Facebook

You can find my original post on this topic at F*c*book Goes All In on Censorship

01 December 2024

F*c*book Goes All In on Censorship

Why is anyone still using that crap system? Smith & Wesson gets kicked off Facebook for its stories about what?? - Must Read Alaska

The American firearms manufacturer Smith & Wesson, which since 1852 has been a leading manufacturer of pistols, revolvers, rifles, and shooting accessories, joined Facebook 15 years ago. It’s now been kicked off of Facebook for breaking the rules by posting stories about … wait for it … weapons.

“Despite our extensive efforts and resources spent on trying to adhere to Facebook’s ever-changing community guidelines on firearms, our account was suspended indefinitely on Friday, November 22nd, 15 years after its original creation. In an era where free speech and the right to bear arms are under constant attack, we want to thank @elonmusk and @X for supporting free speech and our constitutional rights guaranteed by the 1st and 2nd Amendments.

Go read the whole thing. (Hat tip to KABA)

29 November 2024

F*c*book and the Downfall of Myanmar

Faine Greenwood: Facebook Destroys Everything: Part 1

Some background on the short-lived, democratically-elected government of Myanmar that was replaced by a military junta in 2021.

As this last dismal decade in Myanmar unfolded, one thing has become exceedingly clear: Facebook, in its rush to massively profit from getting an entire country on the Internet in just a few short years, played a key role in the country’s slide into hell. During that blood-soaked period from 2016 to 2018, website’s attention-hunting algorithms pumped vast amounts of ferocious anti-Rohingya content into the feeds of millions of Myanmar Facebook users, and the site failed over and over to counter dangerous hate speech, ignoring pleas from local activists, including some people I knew.

As I have said for years... I never trusted F*c*book. I have a user-id. I originally logged in about twice a year to change the password. Less frequently since they instituted better security. (My F*c*book account was hacked once, back when F*c*book didn't take security all that seriously.

Go read the whole thing. (Hat tip to Tam at View From The Porch: Tab Clearing...)

05 August 2024

F*c*book Didn't Think the Law Applied to Them

This settlement might make them take notice of the law. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Wins $1.4 Billion Settlement

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton recently announced that he won a $1.4 billion settlement from Meta, the parent company of Facebook, over privacy-related issues dealing with Facebook acquiring Texan users’ facial and biometric data without their knowledge or getting their consent.

Click thru for details on what F*c*book does, and how long it was disregarding Texas law.

Hat tip to Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit:

EVEN ZUCK WILL NOTICE THIS

Yeah. That's a lot of cash. It will be paid over 5 years.

28 July 2024

F*c*book - Guns Are Bad

No Olympic coverage for you! Facebook and Instagram Have Decided That Olympic Shooting Sports Are Dangerous and Glorify Violence

So no Olympic shooter can be shown with their guns.

The future is stupid.

Hat tip to EBL and Saturday Night Girls With Guns.

Last week had women Olympic shooters, but given this new policy not to show firearms...

Saturday night is right for girls with guns.

Click the EBL link for some great photos.

24 May 2024

Is DEI Just a Grift?

It seems that at least one "DEI chief" is a grifter. Meta Platforms Ex-Employee Furlow-Smiles Face 5 years in Prison for $5 Million Occupational Fraud

In a striking case of corporate fraud, Barbara Furlow-Smiles, a former global diversity executive at Facebook, now Meta Platforms, Inc., was sentenced to five years and three months in prison for stealing a total of more than $5 million from those companies.

Personally, I find it hard to get upset that F*c*book was taken to the cleaners for $5 million. That is chump change for the likes of Meta. I am glad to see that the nature of people running DEI at large corporations is being exposed.

To sustain her scheme, Furlow-Smiles recruited a diverse group of individuals, including friends, relatives, former interns, nannies, babysitters, a hair stylist, and her university tutor. These accomplices played various roles in receiving payments and returning kickbacks. Additionally, she manipulated company funds to benefit herself directly, such as paying nearly $10,000 to an artist for speciality portraits and over $18,000 in preschool tuition fees.

Her "university tutor" was involved. I take that to be a faculty advisor. They didn't mention the name of the university. Are we shocked to learn that a DEI (or whatever) mentor is willing to take part in a crime scheme? I'm not.

06 May 2024

It Is Hard to Be Upset at the Demise of Meta

Or F*c*book, as I usually call it. Facebook’s AI Spam Isn’t the ‘Dead Internet’: It’s the Zombie Internet

AI has destroyed F*c*book? I'm so sad.

Over the last few months, many have proposed that the AI spam taking over Facebook is a great example of the “Dead Internet Theory,” which posits that large portions of the internet are made up of bots talking to bots, filtered through the lens of recommendation and engagement algorithms. Facebook is undeniably cooked, a decaying, depressing hall of horrors full of viral AI-generated content that seemingly gets worse every day.

But I do not think Facebook is the dead internet. Instead, I think it is something worse. Facebook is the zombie internet, where a mix of bots, humans, and accounts that were once humans but aren’t anymore mix together to form a disastrous website where there is little social connection at all.

But then I never thought giving so much power to one company was a good idea. I really do hope this is a case of The Mighty Have Fallen.

You have to subscribe to 404 Media to see the entire article, but who cares. Now I doubt that F*c*book will die in the short run, but if the AI gets worse, people will decide that it doesn't matter anymore.

After watching F*c*book (and other Social Media platforms) cancel so many people because of "the wrong opinion", it would be good to see them get canceled. (Hat tip to Tam at View from the Porch: The Zombie Internet.)

03 April 2024

Did You Think Your Facebook Messages Were Private?

Why would you think such a thing, you sweet summer child? Facebook let Netflix see user DMs to help them tailor content as part of a close collaboration between the two tech giants, new court documents claims | Daily Mail Online

If you use F*c*book, you don't pay for that service. That is because YOU, or more precisely your activities online, are the product being sold.

Lawyers alleged that 'within a month' of [Netflix's co-founder Reed] Hastings joining Facebook's board of directors, the two companies signed an 'Inbox API' (Application Programming Interface) agreement that 'allowed Netflix programmatic access to Facebook's user's private message inboxes.'

There is more about Cambridge Analytica, fines levied by Ireland and other political entities.

If I'm not using Signal, I assume that my messages are not private, and even Signal is subject to issues if my phone is hacked. But protests to the contrary, if you're not using Signal, I wouldn't count on your messages staying private.

01 April 2024

Facebook Hacked Into Snapchat, Google, and Amazon

Because of course they did. Facebook Secretly Wiretapped Competitors: Documents | ZeroHedge

"Move fast and break things." That is the Silicon Valley creed, or it was. In this case what was broken appears to have been the law.

So let's start with the conclusion.

Facebook’s actions amounted to wiretapping and violated federal law.

What they did (allegedly) was set up Man-in-the-Middle attacks. These are (or were anyway) fairly common attacks. The tech is well known. If your private phone connects to your employer's WiFi, they are probably doing a Man-in-the-Middle attack to read all of your network traffic. A, because they can, and B, the courts said that they could. (It is their WiFi, after all).

In one email, Mr. Zuckerberg wrote that there was a need to receive information about Snapchat but that their traffic was encrypted. “Given how quickly they’re growing, it seems important to figure out a new way to get reliable analytics about them. Perhaps we need to do panels or write custom software. You should figure out how to do this,” he wrote.

The details of what they did, are fairly technical, and I'm not sure that ZeroHedge does the best job of explaining it. Clicking on the link would be a good place to start if you're interested in the details, but there are probably better articles. Most journalists who don't work in tech will not understand the details themselves, and won't be trying to present them anyway. And some journalists who do work in tech are still journalists, not hackers, and will be confused.

Still the legal implications are interesting enough.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs, who are advertisers, have asked the court handling the case, the U.S. District Court in northern California, to grant them three additional hours with Mr. Zuckerberg so they can ask him more about what happened. They also asked for sanctions against Meta, which owns Facebook, because Meta did not disclose the program when initially asked for all information and data that Facebook derived from Onavo’s work.

By the way, if you don't want your employer to read your network traffic, don't connect to their WiFi. Also don't use their phone for your business. They have the right to read that traffic as well. (It is their phone, after all.)

Hat tip goes to Did Facebook Run A Man-in-The-Middle Hack Against Competitors?

  1. This is all from Snapchat’s court documents, so you have to put an “allegedly” on all this.
  2. If all the allegations are true, Facebook has just broken all sorts of federal anti-hacking laws, including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), the Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act, and probably half a dozen more I haven’t even thought of.
  3. That Zuckerberg himself is (allegedly) directly implicated in deliberately breaking federal law is pretty breathtaking. He could be looking at serious jail time. Or would be, if he weren’t such a big Democratic Party Donor.

06 August 2023

F*c*book versus Canada

Canada thought they could pressure Meta into saving their propaganda outlets. Excuse me, "News" outlets. Facebook and Instagram’s news blackout in Canada starts today

As promised, Meta has begun blocking news content in Canada. Starting today, Facebook and Instagram users in the country will no longer be able to view or share news links or see videos and photos posted by publishers and broadcasters. The company, which has threatened to make the drastic move for several months, said it will take a few weeks for the change to come into effect for all users in the country.

David and Goliath is an interesting tale, but in most cases the small guy gets crushed by the big guy.

Meta made the decision in response to Canadian legislators passing the Online News Act. The law requires certain platforms to negotiate revenue-sharing agreements with news organizations.

It mandates revenue sharing with news organizations that appear on the platform in question. No news organizations appear, no revenue, no sharing.

Now they may relent and pay for news, as they do in Australia. I mean, Canada is bigger than Australia, though I don't know if there is a difference in the laws each country passed.

10 July 2023

Threads - "Instagram... Without the photos"

From Pixy Misa at Ambient Irony. Daily News Stuff 8 July 2023: Red Velvet Rhubarb Edition

So F*c*book produced a clone of Twitter. Sort of. But there is no news allowed. No news. No reaction to news. No questions about news. Whether economic or political or military or financial or ... News is so devisive. Let's just talk about sports and food and movies (I wonder if negative opinions, or financial info about movies would be allowed, or would that be news?) In other words, commercial content.

No news, just content. No opinions. Just consume.

Consume, be silent, die. Your only remaining freedom is to choose the order in which you fulfil those tasks.

Oh, and also give up the last vestiga of your privacy to F*c*book.

Your only remaining freedom: Threads is a privacy nightmare, and has no plans for an EU launch because it breaks at least three hundred different laws there. (Tech Crunch)

And they are not kidding around. The kinds of data they want to harvest about you is quite a bit.

...including health and financial data, precise location, browsing history, contacts, search history and other sensitive information. [Ref. Tech Crunch]

I agree with Pixy Misa on this one.

That's gonna be a no from me, Zuckerdawg.

And you should read the whole thing, as it is entertaining.

14 June 2023

Algorithms Are Hard - They Are Math After All

It is amazing how Instagram manages to police some things (like anything that contradicts the Green Narrative™, or COVID's origin, or ...), and seems to be blind to other things. Instagram algorithm boosted 'vast pedophile network': report

Instagram’s recommendation algorithms linked and even promoted a “vast pedophile network” that advertised the sale of illicit “child-sex material” on the platform, according to the findings of an alarming report Wednesday.

Instagram allowed users to search by hashtags related to child-sex abuse, including graphic terms such as #pedowhore, #preteensex, #pedobait and #mnsfw — the latter an acronym meaning “minors not safe for work,” researchers at Stanford University and the University of Massachusetts Amherst told the Wall Street Journal.

Hat tip goes to JP Sears and his video Instagram Censors You But Allows This?! One of his rare, non-comedy videos. It isn't a laughing matter, after all.

And because someone is sure to point out that Instagram is NOT F*c*book, a reminder: Instagram is owned by Meta, the same company that owns F*c*book. So what I want to know is how much money did Meta make off of this "network." And could that have any connection to why it wasn't shut down like people asking questions about the origins of COVID-19 were? Or were there people - in Meta or outside of the company - pushing to keep this active? We know the government was pushing Meta and Twitter and YouTube and Google and ... to censor anything that they didn't agree with. So how did this slip thru their fingers. Maybe they just don't care. Maybe they are part of the problem. I'm sure we will never find out the answers to any of these questions.

10 September 2022

F*c*book Doesn't Know What Data They Have or Where it Goes

This is beyond sad. From Vice: Facebook Engineers Admit They Don’t Know What They Do With Your Data

I'm tempted to just drop the subtitle, and bolt, but here is the subtitle anyway.

In a court hearing, a Facebook engineer said Facebook’s engineering culture is “terrifying.”

In a court case, recently made public, F*c*book "engineers" admitted that they have no idea what happens to the data they have, or where and how it is stored.

[Daniel] Garrie [the Discovery Special Master] called the hearing in question with Zarashow and Elia to figure out exactly where personal data may be stored in 55 Facebook subsystems. The two engineers struggled to answer some relatively basic questions, and were surprisingly candid when talking about the results of Facebook’s open culture when it comes to developing software and systems.

So if they can't answer the question about where data is stored in the 55 different systems, and how those systems communicate, or who can see that data, how can they swear that they are abiding by various data privacy laws, or safeguarding the data of children, or anything else?

This is all about the court case dealing with Cambridge Analytica. Between what I know of that, and what was revealed by these two in the hearing, I think the answer to the questions I asked about F*c*book and privacy are problem, "They can't." But hey, that's only my guess.

Well, some privacy experts share that assessment, while the company is spouting platitudes about its privacy efforts.

For privacy experts who have followed this lawsuit, the admissions made by the engineers in the hearing are damning.

“The personal data of billions of people has been absorbed into the Facebook machine—similar to a drop of ink in a lake—and the world is dealing with the real-life consequences,” Jason Kint, an outspoken critic of Facebook and CEO of Digital Content Next, a trade organization that represents journalism publishers, told Motherboard.

Kint referred to a metaphor used by a Facebook engineer in the leaked document published by Motherboard.

Click thru for even more depressing details.

Another article from The Intercept_ on the subject: Facebook Engineers: We Have No Idea Where We Keep All Your Personal Data.

From that article we get a bit more on the background. Cambridge Analytica became a scandal which precipitated a lawsuit. When told to turn over the data F*c*book had on the plaintiffs, they gave only the most surface data that you would get from Download Your Information, and said anything else was outside the scope of the lawsuit.

In 2020, the judge disagreed with the company’s contention, ruling that Facebook’s initial disclosure had indeed been too sparse and that the company must reveal data obtained through its oceanic ability to surveil people across the internet and make monetizable predictions about their next moves.

That's where the legal process has run into a stonewall; a wall known as the "engineering culture" at F*c*book. That is in quotes because in reality, it is the management culture of the company that allows chaos like this to reign.

The hat tip for all this goes to Schneier on Security: Facebook Has No Idea What Data It Has.

21 February 2022

The Scandal F*c*book Doesn't Want You to Know About

Or Meta, or whatever they are calling themselves today. Why? Because they don't want the bad PR of course. Meta axes a head of global community development after he appears on video in underage sex sting | TechCrunch

”The seriousness of these allegations cannot be overstated. The individual is no longer employed with the company. We are actively investigating this situation and cannot provide further comment at this time,” said a statement from a Meta spokesperson provided to us by Drew Pusateri. I’ll point out that Pusateri also tried to talk me out of the newsworthiness of this story over the phone before sending over the statement, noting that other outlets were not covering it (thanks for the advice). [My emphasis. Z-Deb]

Not The Bee takes that to mean the likes of NY Times, and WaPo will not be covering this. Nothing to see here. Move along.

Back to TechCrunch.

Even underage sex scandals are not new news at this point.

If you follow that link in the quote, you find a story at TC from 2017, in which they report on F*c*book replacing the head of Computer Vision at Occulus VR, who was apparently, or allegedly, caught in an underage sex sting operation.

And Not the Bee has a quick lesson in professional journalism.

Here we digress for a quick lesson in Journalism 101:

In journalism, if a source actively attempts to get you to not report on a story, that means it's really quite a bad story for them. [emphasis in the original.]

10 November 2021

F*c*book Rules: Don't Mention Certain Atrocities

Can't tell the Truth. It might upset the narrative. Reporting on Muslim Persecution of Christians Offends Facebook's 'Standards' - American Thinker

Apparently, reporting on the horrific persecution Christian minorities experience in the Muslim world is a punishable offense for Facebook, as that topic falls beneath the social media giant's "standards."

The truth got a post taken down and a 24 hour suspension. "Don't upset the narrative!" That suspension took place 8 months after the post was published.

It isn't just F*c*book of course. The BBC also doesn't like the Truth. Well, some truths anyway.

The following excerpt from that article is the only thing I can think of that might have especially vexed Facebook (even though it's 100% true):

It's worth recalling that, at the time of their abduction and subsequent butchery, Western media were largely absent. Indeed, before the video appeared, the BBC had falsely reported that the majority of those now slaughtered Copts were "released." (Such downplaying of Muslim persecution of Christians is not uncommon for the BBC.)

What is the Narrative that is being protected? I leave that to you to discern. There are actually several that could be served by stifling this particular Truth. (Hat tip to Wombat-socho.)

05 October 2021

People Don't Understand the House of Cards That Is Called the Internet

This isn't the first outage caused by Border Gateway Protocol (BGP); it probably won't be the last. Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp back online after BGP fix

F*c*book had not responded to inquiries from reporters yesterday, but then they spent most of the day afternoon trying to pick up the pieces. Even the F*c*book email servers were down.

Today, at approximately 11:50 AM EST, all three websites [Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp] were suddenly unreachable, with browsers displaying DNS errors when attempting to open them.

The funniest/sadest part of the day was when they announced that they...

  1. Needed to get physical access to the data centers to correct the configuration errors, and
  2. couldn't get into the buildings because the access system relied on the FB internet servers, which were broken.

You can file this under "no one does proper systems design anymore." Building access was required to fix the internet problems, but the internet was required for building access. I'm sure that they are not alone, and I doubt that they will change much relative to their access system. It would be expensive for one thing. And they would have to admit that it was wrong to begin with. "Modes of Failure" is a term people have forgotten about.

The outage lasted until 5PM Eastern, when the BGP routes were available again, and the servers reappeared on the internet.

It is unclear what caused today's outage, but it was likely due to a configuration error, like many other BGP-related outages in the past.

It will be interesting to see how this is explained.

And when F*c*book made this error, they shot themselves in the foot. There are other places a similar configuration error could shoot other people in the foot.