Woman Defends Herself From Domestic Violence Attack

I wish the gun-hating part of the Left would explain how the world would be a better place if this woman didn't have the means to defend herself. Tulsa police investigate deadly shooting at Bradford Apartments

Authorities say the woman who called police shot her child's father because he was assaulting her and threatened to kill her.

Police say she was questioned and showed multiple signs of domestic abuse. Officers say she has been released pending further investigation.

The gun-hating part of the Left also likes to go on at length about how you are more likely to shoot someone you know than a total stranger. There is a reason for that. You are more likely to have issues with people you know, and they don't even have to fall into this category of domestic violence.

"People you know" includes a lot of people aside from ex-boyfriends, ex-girlfriends, ex-husbands, etc. Coworkers turned stalker. People at your local coffee shop. And more. To say, or at least imply, that none of them could ever pose a threat is either naive or a lie.

So how is the world a better place if this woman would have been severely beaten, or beaten to death? Without the means of self-defense, the old and the infirm will be at the mercy of the young and the violent, the small can be beaten or killed by the large, and anyone can be overpowered by numbers of attackers. I wish the gun-hating part of the Left would explain how that world would be better, but I don't believe that they will.

Self-defense is a human right, and Oklahoma has not morphed into a copy of New Jersey.