If not with a firearm, how should she defend herself? Home invasion thwarted by armed homeowner - AOL
A man is accused of breaking into a woman’s house, only for her to confront the intruder with a gun, leading him out of the home. He was later arrested.
Given how this started, I think she should have shot him. Maybe more than once.
The suspect, Sergio Ruiz, 21, and the victim’s first interaction seemed innocuous as he texted her wanting eggs, as she had a sign outside saying she was selling them. However, the messages reportedly escalated into sexual and vulgar comments.
Although she blocked his number, Ruiz allegedly started texting her from a different one.
This doesn't sound like a guy who can take a hint.
Mesa County, Colorado, is on the state line with Utah, roughly 130 miles west of Denver.
Cops eventually located and arrested this guy, after he left.
Ruiz was booked in the Mesa County Detention Facility for stalking, second-degree home burglary and attempted non-consensual sexual assault. He was given a $100,000 bond, which the sheriff’s office stated, “has gone untouched.”
So I would like the gun-hating part of the Left (it isn't all of the Left, though it often seems that way) to explain exactly what this woman should have done, without a firearm? I am not expecting them to explain.
Self-defense is a human right.
I know that you know this, but it needs to be said out loud. The left only hate guns when others (the right) are also allowed to have them. They love guns when every one else is disarmed and they are not. Otherwise organizations like the Socialist Rifle Association would not exist.
ReplyDelete