It was just about control. UK government was warned more children would die from suicide than COVID-19 before approving school closures: report
The parents' campaign group UsForThem found that the government had concluded that school closures would have little effect on transmission of the virus as early as March 2020.
So if they KNEW that school closures would stop the disease, and would harm students, why were the schools kept closed?
“We urgently need answers as to why the UK deviated from its pandemic plan and closed schools initially without any clear support plan and why later when the damage was known and acknowledged by our most senior scientists and educationalists we closed schools again," said Danny Kruger, Conservative MP for Devizes in Wiltshire.
As early as February-March 2020, SAGE documents stated that closing schools would have a "highly limited" effect on viral transmission. UsForThem found that before the first school closures in March, a SAGE paper had already concluded that for school closures to have any impact, they would need to be closed for a lengthy period of time. This was not communicated to the public.
Western democracy was nice while it lasted, but it seems to have been completely replaced by authoritarian nanny states. "Shut up and do what we tell you, because it is for your own good, for the children, for national security, or any other excuse we can think of." Well, maybe not completely.
No one will be held to account for the damage done to a generation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Moderation is in place. Your comment will be visible as soon as I can get to it. Unless it is SPAM, and then it will never see the light of day.
Be Nice. Personal Attacks WILL be deleted. And I reserve the right to delete stuff that annoys me.