An Actual Big-media Article that Covers Both Sides of an Issue?

OK, I really am shocked. Black Gun Owners Eager to Flex Carry Powers After N.Y. Law Falls

I won't say the article is completely neutral, it isn't. It is solidly anti-gun, anti-gunowner, and it seems to be saying that blacks shouldn't own guns. Though they never come right out and say that. They aren't completely stupid.

Philip Smith, founder and national president of the National African American Gun Association, which filed an amicus brief against the New York law, said the court ruling reinforces the rights of gun owners like Castile.

“When he was shot by that officer, after watching that video, I told our members, make sure you can still carry in your state. The one thing we cannot do is to act cowardly and to shudder in the corner like we don’t deserve to have a gun,” Smith said. “We’re going to stand tall and exercise our Second Amendment rights.”

They talk to all the usual suspects, cops who are worried their job will be harded. You know, like the cops in Uvalde who did nothing, or the cops who screw up and can't be held accountable for their screw ups. It will make that job where they don't have to do anything, and don't have to answer for their mistakes harder somehow.

In the meantime, the Democrats are trying to find ways to subvert the SCOTUS ruling.

Democratic-run states fearing a surge in violence are already trying to counter the court’s ruling and find ways to keep firearms off the streets.

Anyway, I thought the article wasn't bad, for a bunch of professional journalists.