26 April 2023

How to Provide the Least Information Possible in a Case of Self-defense

If there was any more left out of this article, they wouldn't have written it. KCSO: Man shot another on Barnett Street in self-defense

It's like they couldn't even be bothered to ask a couple of questions.

Oh, and "Professional Journalists" still have trouble distinguishing the victims from the criminals who attack them.

An investigation showed a man forced his way into a house on Barnett Street and another man shot him to defend the homeowner, KCSO said. A gun was recovered, and no one has been arrested.

Was the gun recovered from the would-be bad guy? Was the gun the one used in legal self-defense? Was this a domestic-violence incident (it sounds like one to me), or what? Based on the "reporting" that has been done by The Bakersfield Californian we may never know the answers to these questions. It's almost like once the reporter found out this was legal self-defense, and wouldn't help advance the Agenda™ of the Left, the completely unbiased observer lost their interest in the story.

Maybe more information will come to light, but probably not by way of this news outlet (so called).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment Moderation is in place. Your comment will be visible as soon as I can get to it. Unless it is SPAM, and then it will never see the light of day.

Be Nice. Personal Attacks WILL be deleted. And I reserve the right to delete stuff that annoys me.