And Prosecutors HATE that. Jury acquits Pasadena man of murder, says he acted in self-defense on his property
A guy you know is drunk, disgruntled because you fired him, and he has been making threats.
Prosecutors said the homeowner was too quick to open fire on Jeffrey Dickinson. Gregory Korwek’s defense attorneys said the 44-year-old left him no choice.
Because we can't have people exercising individual responsiblity. Especially not in the People's Republic of California. Where will it end?
The 12 jurors decided Korwek was justified to use deadly force and that the homicide did not amount to second-degree murder or voluntary manslaughter. Murder requires an intent to kill. O’Neill maintained Korwek had none.
The DA then issued some bullshit statement, to try and cover up the fact that this shouldn't have been brought to trial in the first place. In Texas, or Oklahoma, the cops would have bought this guy a coffee. Or something stronger.
Self-defense is a Human-right, and it might even be your legal right, but not if the DAs have anything to say about it.
This sounds like an argument for one of the legal defense plans. Any thoughts on those?
ReplyDeleteI have looked into them, but I have not purchased one, usually because I have had a lawyer for other concerns. Though I have been looking at them again.
Delete